Don't have an account? To participate in discussions consider signing up!

  • More about the Obama Acorn Connection

    4 posts, 4 voices (who?), started 1 month ago

    Posted on Thursday, October 9, 2008 by annie123

    rss feedTopic RSS feed

    • Fabulous
      (( Online ))

      Obama Directed Project Vote And Later Taught Classes For “Future Leaders Identified By ACORN And The Centers For New Horizons.” “He [Obama] says he is drawn to politics, despite its superficialities, as a means to advance his real passion and calling: community organization. ... In 1992 Obama took time off to direct Project Vote, the most successful grass-roots voter- registration campaign in recent city history. Credited with helping elect Carol Moseley-Braun to the U.S. Senate, the registration drive, aimed primarily at African-Americans, added an estimated 125,000 voters to the voter rolls—even more than were registered during Harold Washington’s mayoral campaigns. ‘It’s a power thing,’ said the brochures and radio commercials. ... Obama continues his organizing work largely through classes for future leaders identified by ACORN and the Centers for New Horizons on the south side.” (Hank De Zutter, Op-Ed, “What Makes Obama Run?” ChicagoReader, 12/8/95)  

      “Obama was part of a team of attorneys who represented the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in a lawsuit against the state of Illinois in 1995 for failing to implement a federal law designed to make it easier for the poor and others to register as voters.” (Mike Robinson, “Obama Got Start In Civil Rights Practice,” The Associated Press, 2/20/07)  

      "ACORN's Political Action Committee Endorsed Barack Obama for President. ... The endorsement reflects a belief that Obama - who worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago - understands that change must come from the ground-up, as part of a working coalition, rather than from position papers." (Katrina Vanden Heuvel, Op-Ed, "ACORN: Obama Gets It," The Nation, 2/23/08)  

      "U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to an offshoot of the liberal Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now for services the Democrat's campaign says it mistakenly misrepresented in federal reports. An Obama spokesman said Federal Election Commission reports would be amended to show Citizens Services Inc. - a subsidiary of ACORN - worked in 'get-out-the-vote' projects, instead of activities such as polling, advance work and staging major events as stated in FEC finance reports filed during the primary." (David M. Brown, "Obama To Amend Report On $800,000 In Spending," Pittsburgh Tribune Review, 8/22/08)


        • terriofcarasan wrote Oct 9, 2008
        • Hi Annie123,
          Thanks for the info….That is all I will write as I don’t want hate mail! But I am no Obama fan….enough said!



        Reply to comment


        • annie123 wrote Oct 9, 2008
        • By the way, everyone please note I didn’t cross anything out in the quotes above. I think our website does this when there are dashes.

          ______________________

          This is my opinion. My opinions are in no way representative of those at the company where I work. This is just my opinion.



        Reply to comment


        • sarab wrote Oct 9, 2008
        • annie 123 & terriofcarasan: I am a loyal Democrat. I also happen to be a bit fearful, or perhaps cautious, regarding an Obama presidency. Putting aside Mr. Clinton’s special brand of drama (zippergate), I found him to be a man who really understood the developing global political order and the more and more interconnected world economy such that he steered the Democratic party toward the center in some fundamental ways. Mr. Clinton tried to guide the country toward participation in a more integrated world – integration is something that is inevitable in the tech age we live in.  I fear that Mr. Obama, though young, still is caught in a bit of a time warp.  He uses the language of the old economy and class warfare in his stump speeches now (gone is the unity thing) – it is the rich v. poor stuff and redistribution of wealth as the answer. I believe that this world is ill-suited to that approach. The days of heavy manufacturing and company towns in America have largely passed us by.  It is just too expensive to pay labor here and transportation costs have become quite manageable, and even fungible, in our global marketplace in which goods circle the globe no matter where they are produced. Going forward, corporate America will make things in factories with blue collar workers abroad and manage things in office towers with white collar staff here.  That is the American business model – like it or not. Mr. Obama’s economic plan seems to me to pretend that this reality can be avoided or slowed down. I do not think so. And I think that the current financial crisis is creating an odd reaction: voters are feeling angry with Mr. Bush and running toward Obama, even though the McCain economic approach seems better matched to our immediate macro-economic needs. Wild stuff. Dizzying. Migraine time. Gin & Tonic time.  Buy shoes and skirts to feel better time.



        Reply to comment



Women's Fashion SALE 30%-70% OFF