Posted on Thursday, October 9, 2008 by trudys
Topic RSS feed
During the 2000 Republican Presidential Primaries, Slate.com writer Chris Suellentrop wrote an excellent in-depth feature article about John McCain and his role in the Keating Five. This is a must read article for every American, especially for anyone who thinks John McCainis a hero.
Two Important things to know before you read the article:
1. John McCain admitted to intentionally filing false income tax returns to defraud the IRS by not claiming thousands of dollars in gifts McCain and his family received from Charles Keating and Keating’s company. Years later, when the IRS noticed Keating’s company had written off the gifts to McCain as business expenses, McCain fessed up and admitted filing false returns and made a “donation” to the U.S. Treasury to cover the amount he defrauded American tax payers. (Committing tax fraud is one of the least offensive things John McCain has done over his career, but this article just focuses on his role in the Keating Five, and the Lincoln Savings and Loan scandal of the late 1980’s-early 1990’s). McCain also leaked information about the Keating Five to the press multiple times in an effort to appear above the other Senators in the scandal. A 1989 Phoenix New Times article summed it up best with their title - McCain:" rel="nofollow" target="vblank" href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1989-11-29/news/mccain-the-most-reprehensible-of-the-keating-five/1">McCain:">http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/ The Most Reprehensible of the Keating Five.
2. John McCain’s wife, Cindy McCain, along with her father, made a $359,000 investment in retail property owned by Charles Keating in 1986, a year before John McCain first met with federal regulators on behalf of Keating. Keating was later convicted on 73 counts of fraud, conspiracy, and other crimes. Years later, Cindy McCain sold her investment for $15,000,000.
For anyone not aware of the Keating Five, here’s a very simple summary:
Charles Keating owned a savings and loan in California. He was illegally using the money of his bank’s customers to give loans to himself and friends that they didn’t have to repay, and to speculate on risky real estate investments, which was strictly forbidden by U.S. law (and was one cause of the Great Depression).
When the feds found out what was going on and launched an investigation into Keating and his company, Keating called five U.S. Senators whom he had wined, dined, and lavished with hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations and personal gifts.
Keating asked the five Senators to tell the feds to bug off, and the five Senators, later known as the Keating Five, obliged, meeting with federal investigators twice and pressuring them to stop investigating Keating’s crimes. They bought Keating some time, but the feds didn’t give up and eventually Keating was nailed. The reason the feds were so persistent was because Keating wasn’t playing with mere chump change. Keating blew $3.4 billion through illegal personal loans and bad investments, and the FDIC had to reimburse Keating’s customers who had been ripped off.
(Background Info – Keating wasn’t the only Savings and Loan owner who was committing fraud, 2 of the Sxx%L’s that failed during that three year period were found to have been caused by fraud and/or insider trading. The failure of the Lincoln Savings and Loan and other S&L’s pushed the country into a recession, costing the U.S. government $126 billion dollars in FDIC insurance payouts to investors. All of this came to a crescendo during the first year of the presidency of George H.W. Bush, who pushed through the S&L bailout plan to keep the economy afloat.)
When the involvement of the Keating Five was made public, a scandal erupted and the Senate Ethics Committee launched their own investigation into whether the Keating Five had violated Senate ethics rules. The other four Senators left office either immediately or within one term. John McCain was formally rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for exercising “poor judgment” for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating, but because McCain accepted Keating’s gifts of travel and vacations to Bahama while McCain was a member of the House of Representatives (he served one term there before moving to the Senate), the Senate claimed they had no jurisdiction to censure McCain. (However the meetings to pressure federal regulators occurred during the first few months of McCain serving in the Senate in 1987, so that excuse doesn’t hold up)
John McCain then went back to the drawing board and re-invented himself as “the Straight-Talk Express” and the media gobbled it up. “Tax-Evading-Criminal” doesn’t sound as catchy as “Straight-Shooting-War-Hero”.
Ever since the scandal, when McCain lies today, it’s never questioned, because he’s a “straight talker”. The man has more skeletons in his closet than any politician in history. The Keating Five is just one bone.
After reading the Slate article, ask yourself: if Obama or any other candidate had a scandal such as the Keating Five in their past, would the mainstream media never question it? Could any other candidate even have a political career after the Keating Five? For the other four Senators, the answer is no. And while Charles Keating went to prison for his role in the scandal, John McCain swept it under the rug and could soon be President of the United States of America.
Read the full Slate.com article here.
The FDIC also has a list of recommendations for further reading on Charles Keating and the Lincoln Savings and Loan.
“During the 2000 Republican Presidential Primaries, Slate.com writer Chris Suellentrop wrote an excellent in-depth feature article about John McCain and his role in the Keating Five. This is a must read article for every American, especially for anyone who thinks John McCainis a hero.
Two Important things to know before you read the article:
1. John McCain admitted to intentionally filing false income tax returns to defraud the IRS by not claiming thousands of dollars in gifts McCain and his family received from Charles Keating and Keating’s company. Years later, when the IRS noticed Keating’s company had written off the gifts to McCain as business expenses, McCain fessed up and admitted filing false returns and made a “donation” to the U.S. Treasury to cover the amount he defrauded American tax payers. (Committing tax fraud is one of the least offensive things John McCain has done over his career, but this article just focuses on his role in the Keating Five, and the Lincoln Savings and Loan scandal of the late 1980’s-early 1990’s). McCain also leaked information about the Keating Five to the press multiple times in an effort to appear above the other Senators in the scandal. A 1989 Phoenix New Times article summed it up best with their title – McCain: The Most Reprehensible of the Keating Five.
2. John McCain’s wife, Cindy McCain, along with her father, made a $359,000 investment in retail property owned by Charles Keating in 1986, a year before John McCain first met with federal regulators on behalf of Keating. Keating was later convicted on 73 counts of fraud, conspiracy, and other crimes. Years later, Cindy McCain sold her investment for $15,000,000.
For anyone not aware of the Keating Five, here’s a very simple summary:
Charles Keating owned a savings and loan in California. He was illegally using the money of his bank’s customers to give loans to himself and friends that they didn’t have to repay, and to speculate on risky real estate investments, which was strictly forbidden by U.S. law (and was one cause of the Great Depression).
When the feds found out what was going on and launched an investigation into Keating and his company, Keating called five U.S. Senators whom he had wined, dined, and lavished with hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations and personal gifts.
Keating asked the five Senators to tell the feds to bug off, and the five Senators, later known as the Keating Five, obliged, meeting with federal investigators twice and pressuring them to stop investigating Keating’s crimes. They bought Keating some time, but the feds didn’t give up and eventually Keating was nailed. The reason the feds were so persistent was because Keating wasn’t playing with mere chump change. Keating blew $3.4 billion through illegal personal loans and bad investments, and the FDIC had to reimburse Keating’s customers who had been ripped off.
(Background Info – Keating wasn’t the only Savings and Loan owner who was committing fraud, 2 of the Sxx%L’s that failed during that three year period were found to have been caused by fraud and/or insider trading. The failure of the Lincoln Savings and Loan and other S&L’s pushed the country into a recession, costing the U.S. government $126 billion dollars in FDIC insurance payouts to investors. All of this came to a crescendo during the first year of the presidency of George H.W. Bush, who pushed through the S&L bailout plan to keep the economy afloat.)
When the involvement of the Keating Five was made public, a scandal erupted and the Senate Ethics Committee launched their own investigation into whether the Keating Five had violated Senate ethics rules. The other four Senators left office either immediately or within one term. John McCain was formally rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for exercising “poor judgment” for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating, but because McCain accepted Keating’s gifts of travel and vacations to Bahama while McCain was a member of the House of Representatives (he served one term there before moving to the Senate), the Senate claimed they had no jurisdiction to censure McCain. (However the meetings to pressure federal regulators occurred during the first few months of McCain serving in the Senate in 1987, so that excuse doesn’t hold up)
John McCain then went back to the drawing board and re-invented himself as “the Straight-Talk Express” and the media gobbled it up. “Tax-Evading-Criminal” doesn’t sound as catchy as “Straight-Shooting-War-Hero”.
Ever since the scandal, when McCain lies today, it’s never questioned, because he’s a “straight talker”. The man has more skeletons in his closet than any politician in history. The Keating Five is just one bone.
After reading the Slate article, ask yourself: if Obama or any other candidate had a scandal such as the Keating Five in their past, would the mainstream media never question it? Could any other candidate even have a political career after the Keating Five? For the other four Senators, the answer is no. And while Charles Keating went to prison for his role in the scandal, John McCain swept it under the rug and could soon be President of the United States of America.
Read the full Slate.com article here.
The FDIC also has a list of recommendations for further reading on Charles Keating and the Lincoln Savings and Loan.
Fair is fair right? We really should know about all the candidates less than stellar background information. Right?
Trudy
Nutritional Cleansing Consultant and Coach
Isagenix(R) - Real People. Real Results.
www.MaximizeYourLife.us
OH – and sorry for the doubling of the article….the system does that to me every time I try to post a link or bold or italic etc. I didn’t catch it this time…or I thought I did but…wrong!
Trudy
Nutritional Cleansing Consultant and Coach
Isagenix(R) - Real People. Real Results.
www.MaximizeYourLife.us
I agree. Everyone needs to know everything about everyone’s past who is running for office.
Luckily, these past wrongdoings don’t (in my mind) impact a McCain adimnistration in the future – whereas Obama’s associations (former and current) may.
Thanks for posting this. We need a balanced perspective and a healthy discussion on both sides.
Annie
______________________
This is my opinion. My opinions are in no way representative of those at the company where I work. This is just my opinion.
I agree, fair is fair. Thank you for helping us all to see that everyone has done things they are not proud of. Including having shady associations.
Thanks Trudys,
There most definitely needs to be more balance in perspectives here and not just in politics.
Unfortunately people are going to believe what they want to believe, hear only what they want to hear and see only what they choose to see. Which is one reason I choose not to comment on anything political.
inankika I read you…It’s amazes me that past associations by one outweighs the past associations of another.
peace.
almostfive0 – It’s not the associations as much as what those associations stand for. There is no such thing as a former terrorist (in my mind). If you think differently, we can agree to disagree.
______________________
This is my opinion. My opinions are in no way representative of those at the company where I work. This is just my opinion.
I swore I wasn’t commenting on these political blogs, but here I go…(must…prepare…ego…for…attack…)
I feel comfortable posting here, thanks Trudy. I was seriously uncomfortable with the two ANTI ANTI Obama blogs yesterday. There was no room for the opposite side to take part. It was vitriolic, hostile, and nearly hysterical.
Wow. I’m sorry you felt that way.
The funny thing is, I really liked Obama in the beginning. But the more I listened and the more I read, my opinions slowly changed and now he just scares me.
There have been strong opinions on both sides in various discussions. I have certainly felt the same from Obama supporters, so I know what you mean. Sorry if it was me that made you feel that way.
______________________
This is my opinion. My opinions are in no way representative of those at the company where I work. This is just my opinion.
Hey almostfive0,
Mike B. says “We‘re not gonna fall for another banana in the tailpipe“! Activate!
cindylou – I wrote something to you but it didn’t wind up at the bottom of the thread but before posts that came before so I hope you saw it.
______________________
This is my opinion. My opinions are in no way representative of those at the company where I work. This is just my opinion.
Ladie….there are 2 things I never ever discuss:
POLITICS and RELIGION
Therefore…..peace out :)
I saw it, thanks. I think I am just going to stay away from political, period. I am keeping my blogs light and stoo-pid.
I agree with you, CindyLou. I have tried to keep my political opinions to myself. But hey, you know what they say about opinions…..
| Lets Talk Politics | View Group » |
Politics, Presidents, and Political Issues…